Skip to content

101: The Four Noble Truths

March 25, 2011

Rosewood Mala and the Noble Truths by vociferous via Flickr

Note: This is part of an On Dharma series in the theme of Buddhism 101.  It is specifically designed for the Google, as in, for individuals who might enter the topic as a search term.  Two things make the 101 series at Dharma Cowgirl unique.  First, an ecumenical presentation that looks at the whole spectrum of Buddhism for answers, from Theravada to Vajrayana and everywhere in between.  (Links to relevant sources are included.)  Second, straight talk from a straight talker that relates the teaching directly to everyday American experience.  The Dharma ain’t rocket science people, but that don’t mean it’s easy.

Today’s topic is The Four Noble Truths.  This is the very first teaching the Buddha offered following his enlightenment.  “As Ven. Sariputta once said, they encompass the entire teaching, just as the footprint of an elephant can encompass the footprints of all other footed beings on earth.” (Thanissaro)  Usually, any intro to Buddhism will begin with the story of the Buddha’s life followed immediately by this teaching.   The Four Noble Truths is sometimes capitalized and sometimes not, but all the same regardless.  The three major branches of Buddhism, Theravada (Hinayana), Mahayana, and Vajrayana (Esoteric or Tantric), generally share very similar interpretations of The Four Noble Truths, though in some schools they are emphasized more than others.  Mahayana and Vajrayana interpretations tend to add an extra element or understanding rather than revise.  I speculate that where they are less emphasized in favor of other more intellectual concepts, such as emptiness or non-self, this is because of their “Well, duh!” nature.  You’ll see what I mean.


Theravadan Buddhas in Colombo, Sri Lanka, by Arthur Chapman via Flickr

The Four Noble Truths are presented in the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta, “Setting the Wheel of Dhamma (Dharma) in Motion Scripture” in the Pali cannon.  (Translation below by Thanissaro Bhikkhu is available on Access to Insight.)  What is translated below as “stress” is often also called “suffering” or “unsatisfactoriness.”  For simplicity sake, I’ll use the word suffering as the most common translation of the original term, dukkha, with the caveat that an exact translation is problematic.

“Now this, monks, is the noble truth of stress:  Birth is stressful, aging is stressful, death is stressful; sorrow, lamentation, pain, distress, & despair are stressful; association with the unbeloved is stressful, separation from the loved is stressful, not getting what is wanted is stressful.

“And this, monks, is the noble truth of the origination of stress: the craving that makes for further becoming — accompanied by passion & delight, relishing now here & now there — i.e., craving for sensual pleasure, craving for becoming, craving for non-becoming.

“And this, monks, is the noble truth of the cessation of stress: the remainderless fading & cessation, renunciation, relinquishment, release, & letting go of that very craving.

“And this, monks, is the noble truth of the way of practice leading to the cessation of stress: precisely this Noble Eightfold Path — right view, right resolve, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right concentration.”

The difference between The Four Noble Truths and so many other religious doctrines is that these are not beliefs.  Rather, this is a phenomenological description of the way the world exists.  Likewise, one doesn’t have to believe in gravity to be affected by it at all times.  Suffering is, it’s as simple as that.  The Truths are traditionally rendered as (with some quibbling over translation):

  1. The Truth of Suffering (Dhukka):  All living beings suffer.
  2. The Truth of the Cause of Suffering (Samudaya): Suffering is caused by desire.
  3. The Truth of the Cessation of Suffering (Nirodha):  Suffering can end.
  4. The Truth of the Path to End Suffering (Magga):  Following the Noble Eightfold Path leads to the end of suffering.

The charge has often been laid that by starting out with suffering, Buddhism presents a basically pessimistic view.  However, study of any of the world’s great religions will by and large reveal that they are all attempts to answer that same question: why do we suffer?  In the Abrahamic faiths this is explained by human beings’ estrangement from God and God’s will, so naturally they start out by talking about God.  In Buddhism, we can skip that step, seeing as very idea of a singular creator god was unknown in India during the Buddha’s lifetime (though the Buddha did address the then current conception of Brahma, which is slightly different).  So rather than being pessimistic, The Four Noble Truths address the problem directly rather like a doctor who must first understand the disease in order to offer a cure.  Furthermore, the Third Noble Truth, is entirely uplifting.  It tells us suffering is optional and, moreover, that we have the power to end it ourselves.  How much more optimism do we need?

Notable Theravadan teachers have this to say about The Four Noble Truths:

“Each of these truths entails a duty: stress is to be comprehended, the origination of stress abandoned, the cessation of stress realized, and the path to the cessation of stress developed. When all of these duties have been fully performed, the mind gains total release. … Thus the study of the four noble truths is aimed first at understanding these four categories, and then at applying them to experience so that one may act properly toward each of the categories and thus attain the highest, most total happiness possible.” – Thanissaro Bhikku

“Now the Four Noble Truths are: there is suffering; there is a cause or origin of suffering; there is a end of suffering; and there is path out of suffering which is the Eightfold Path. Each of these Truths has three aspects so all together there are twelve insights. In the Theravada school, an arahant, a perfected one, is one who has seen clearly the Four Noble Truths with their three aspects and twelve insights. ‘Arahant’ means a human being who understands the truth; it is applied mainly to the teaching of the Four Noble Truths. … We use these Four Noble Truths for our development. We apply them to ordinary things in our lives, to ordinary attachments and obsessions of the mind. With these truths, we can investigate our attachments in order to have the insights. Through the Third Noble Truth, we can realize cessation, the end of suffering, and practice the Eightfold Path until there is understanding. When the Eightfold Path has been fully developed, one is an arahant, one has made it. Even though this sounds complicated – four truths, three aspects, twelve insights – it is quite simple. It is a tool for us to use to help us understand suffering and non-suffering.” – Ajahn Sumedho

“Shortly after his Awakening, the Buddha delivered his first sermon, in which he laid out the essential framework upon which all his later teachings were based. This framework consists of the Four Noble Truths, four fundamental principles of nature (Dhamma) that emerged from the Buddha’s radically honest and penetrating assessment of the human condition. He taught these truths not as metaphysical theories or as articles of faith, but as categories by which we should frame our direct experience in a way that conduces to Awakening. …  Because of our ignorance (avijja) of these Noble Truths, because of our inexperience in framing the world in their terms, we remain bound to samsara, the wearisome cycle of birth, aging, illness, death, and rebirth. Craving propels this process onward, from one moment to the next and over the course of countless lifetimes, in accordance with kamma (Skt. karma), the universal law of cause and effect. … The Buddha discovered that gaining release from samsara requires assigning to each of the Noble Truths a specific task: the first Noble Truth is to be comprehended; the second, abandoned; the third, realized; the fourth, developed.” – John T. Bullit

“…the fundamental meaning of the first noble truth, is the unsatisfactoriness and radical inadequacy of everything conditioned, owing to the fact that whatever is conditioned is impermanent and ultimately bound to perish. … Itself the product of ignorance, an unawareness of the true nature of things, craving springs up wherever there is the prospect of pleasure and enjoyment, bringing along with it the multitude of mental defilements responsible for so much human misery: greed and ambition, hatred and anger, selfishness and envy, conceit, vanity and pride. … Since suffering arises through craving, with the destruction of craving, suffering too must cease: a relationship as tight and inevitable as logical law.  The state that then supervenes, the goal of all striving for Theravada Buddhism, is nirvana, the unconditioned, the deathless, the imperishable peace beyond the round of birth and death.” – Bhikku Bodhi (An Introduction to the Buddha and His Teachings, ed. Samuel Bercholz, Sherab Chodzin Kohn, pages 62-64)


Mahayana Buddha at Kamakura by Chaojikazu via Flickr

Mahayana and Theravada teachings largely agree in their interpretation of The Four Noble Truths.  Where they differ is in their use.  While the Theravadans see realization of the Truths (in all their simplicity and complication and via various methods of mental cultivation) as fully effective for achieving arhat-ship (the endgame of Theravada practice, analogous to buddha-hood or bodhisattva-hood in Mahayana), the Mahayana holds that the Truths and the Path were merely “the first turning of the wheel of Dharma” (Pali: Dhamma).  In other words, the Buddha saved his “highest and best” teaching for later.  One of the most reveared Mahayana texts, the Lotus Sutra (Sanskrit: Saddharma Puṇḍarīka Sūtra), states:

“In the past at Varanasi
You turned the wheel of the Law of the four noble truths,
Making distinctions, preaching that all things
Are born and become extinct, being made up of the five components.
Now you turn the wheel of the most wonderful,
The unsurpassed great Law.
This Law is very profound and abstruse;
There are few who can believe it.”
The Lotus Sutra (Google eBook) by Burton Watson, Kumārajīva, Columbia University Press, 1993, p. 55

The “profound and abstruse” teachings in question are emptiness (sunyata), skillful means (upaya), and the eternal presence of the Buddha.  Emptiness hearkens back to the very First Noble Truth, that suffering exists.  We suffer, the Buddha says, because the nature of existence is impermanent (when we want permanence) and permeated by self (when no such self exists).  As Bhikku Bodhi said above, the nature of things – our so-called self included –  is that they are “conditioned,” that is, the result of causation and therefore subject to change.  In other words, they are empty of inherent existence.  Rather, all things are interconnected, interdependent, and co-arising.  This is where Mahayana makes the leap from enlightenment (arhat-ship) for oneself to enlightenment for all sentient beings, which is the goal of the bodhisattva.  Seeing as we’re all interconnected, we can’t really get enlightened unless everyone gets enlightened.  So the bodhisattva seeks, and at a certain point attains, enlightenment, but then reenters the stream of rebirth, the world of samsara, to teach other sentient beings until such time as we all achieve enlightenment, i.e. Third Noble Truth: the cessation of suffering.

Now, some Mahayana teachings may even seem to deny the Four Noble Truths, stating that they are not truths at all.  After all, how can suffering be a “truth” or “law” of existence if we have the ability to transcend it?  Some Mahayana teachers characterize the four noble truths thus:

  1. Suffering is not permanent, but the Buddha is.
  2. The origin of suffering is not eternal, but the Buddha is.
  3. The cessation of suffering is not unchanging, but the Buddha is.
  4. The path to the end of suffering is not peaceful, but the Buddha is.

In these sentences, Buddha may be exchanged with buddhanature, that is, the inherent or potential enlightenment within all sentient beings.  The Mahayanists are consistently more optimistic on a person’s ability to attain buddha-hood, often in a single lifetime, than the Theravadans.  Scholars speculate that the Mahayana trend to stress buddha-hood for all contributed to its popularity.  However, even this seeming about-face on the Four Noble Truths can be understood by the Mahayana teaching of skillfull means.

“’In this world there are four quadrillion such names to express the Four Holy Truths, in accord with the mentalities of beings to cause them all to be harmonized and pacified…’ [Avatamsaka Sutra, cited to Cleary, p.276] … The standard and norm remains the Four Noble Truths, to which systematic thought and practice has been held accountable in Mahayana as in pre-Mahayana traditions. …those Truths take expression in a limitless variety of ways found effective for experiential appropriation by a diversity of communities of practice and reflection.” –John J. Makransky, “Historical Consciousness as an Offering to the Trans-Historical Buddha,” in Buddhist Theology, p.118, 129

Here is what some notable Mahayana teachers have to say on the issue:

“After realizing complete, perfect awakening (samyak sambodhi), the Buddha had to find words to share his insight.  He already had the water, but he had to discover jars like the Four Noble Truths and the Nobel Eightfold Path to hold it. … The First Noble Truth is suffering (dukkha).  The root meaning of the Chinese character for suffering is ‘bitter.’  Happiness is sweat; suffering is bitter.  We all suffer to some extent. … The Second Noble Truth is the origin, roots, nature, creation, or arising (samudaya) of suffering. After we touch our suffering, we need to look deeply into it to see how it came to be. …  The Third Noble Truth is the cessation (nirodha) of creating suffering by refraining from doing the things that make us suffer.  This is good news!  The Buddha did not deny the existence of suffering, but he also did not deny the existence of joy and happiness. … The Fourth Noble Truth is the path (marga) that leads to refraining from doing the things that cause us to suffer.  This is the path we need the most.”  – Thich Nhat Hanh, The Heart of Buddha’s Teachings, p. 9-11

“It is important to understand that an intellectual grasp of the four noble truths is not considered sufficient; following the Buddhist path requires great effort on the part of the individual, leading to a realization of the truths for oneself.  This realization requires the practice of meditation and is associated with Buddhist monastic practice rather than lay Buddhism.  Although Mahayana Buddhism accepts the four noble truths as the basic teachings of the Buddha, they are not generally a primary topic of Mahayana teaching, nor are they typically the focus of Mahayana meditative practices.  While lay followers of Theravada Buddhism are familiar with the four noble truths, most Mahayana Buddhists are not.” – Helen Josephine Baroni, The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Zen Buddhism, p. 98


Vajrayana Buddha in Lhasa, Tibet, by Jowo Sakyamuni via Flickr

Just as the Mahayana posits a second turning of the wheel of Dharma, the Vajrayana posits a third and final turning to which they lay claim.  Likewise, they also recognize The Four Noble Truths as the first teaching of the Buddha.  The Vajrayana characterizes itself as a “swift path” (the word “Vajrayana” is sometimes translated as “lightning vehicle”).  “This swiftness of the Vajrayana path does not derive from a profound philosophical outlook, but because of the practice of most profound and sophisticated meditative methods,” according to the Institute of Tibetan Classics.  Vajrayana, sometimes called Tantra, Tantric Buddhism, or Esoteric Buddhism, holds the same boddhisattva ideal as the Mahayana, however, it takes skillful means (upaya) to an unprecedented level through complex ritual,  various esoteric forms of yoga and meditation, and the recognition of both relative and ultimate truth.  Even The Four Noble Truths are subject to understanding via the Two Truths (relative and ultimate).

Suffering is a relative truth.  Nirvana (the cessation of suffering and state of enlightenment) is the ultimate truth.  Ignorance is a relative truth.  Buddhanature is the ultimate truth.  The Vajrayana therefore is a path by which one must cultivate one’s apprehension of the ultimate truth.  One becomes a buddha by being a buddha.  For this, Vajrayana employs a multitude of techniques including (but by no means limited to) Dzogchen, ngondro, diety meditation, mandalas, and Mahamudra.

Prominent Vajrayana teachers have this to say on the subject:

“When the great universal teacher Shakyamuni Buddha first spoke about the Dharma in the noble land of India, he taught the four noble truths: the truths of suffering, the cause of suffering, the cessation of suffering and the path to the cessation of suffering. … We experience many different types of suffering. All are included in three categories: the suffering of suffering, the suffering of change and all-pervasive suffering. … Now, desiring liberation from the first two categories of suffering is not the principal motivation for seeking liberation; the Buddha taught that the root of the three sufferings is the third: all-pervasive suffering. … This third, all-pervasive, suffering is under the control of karma and the disturbing mind … of previous lives: anger and attachment arise simply because we have these present aggregates. The aggregate of compounding phenomena is like an enabler for us to generate karma and these disturbing minds… Even if you take your own life, this life, you will have to take another body that will again be the basis of suffering. If you really want to get rid of all your suffering, all the difficulties you experience in your life, you have to get rid of the fundamental cause that gives rise to the aggregates that are the basis of all suffering. Killing yourself isn’t going to solve your problems.” – The Dalai Lama

“If the Buddha had taught his disciples principally by demonstrating his miraculous abilities and various powers, it would not have been the best way to establish them on the path of liberation. The best way to bring them to that wisdom and liberation was to point out the very truth of things; to point out the way things really are. So this is what he did: He showed the truth through the four noble truths and the two truths (relative and absolute truth). By seeing the way things really are, the students learned how to eliminate their mistakes and their delusions. Eliminating one’s mistakes and delusions automatically destroys the causes of one’s suffering and hardships. This allows one to progressively reach the state of liberation and great wisdom. That is why the four noble truths and the two truths are the essence of the first teachings of the Buddha.” – Thrangu Rinpoche


Because you know someone somewhere put a cowboy hat on a Buddha, by Davezilla was taken via Flicker

Finally, we come to it at last, where the Dharma is reduced practically to blasphemy through application of the K.I.S.S. principle.

1. Life sucks.
2. Life sucks ’cause we want stuff.
3. Life don’t gotta suck.
4. There’s a Path for that.

Basically, pain is a factor of living.  You stub your toe, you slam your hand in a car door, you get old, sick, and you die.  We all do it.  The suffering bit, that’s optional.  You curse at the coffee table you stubbed your toe on.  You yell at the spouse who closed the car door too quickly.  You hate fate or God or life when you get old and sick.  We all fear death.  We don’t have to curse, get angry, hate, or fear.  All we have to do is stop wanting the coffee table to have magically been elsewhere, our spouse to have been a little more attentive, not to age or get sick, and not to die.

First of all, what’s done is done.  We can still work for a better future, but there’s no use getting pissed about the past.  Tell your spouse to be more careful when closing the car door, but don’t spread the suffering around such that they get mad at you for being mad at them for what was clearly an accident.  And there’s no use getting pissed about a future we can’t change.  We’re all gonna die.  Suck it up.  Sure, we can work to be healthy, do everything right, and live a good long life (or get hit by a bus tomorrow).  We’re still gonna die.

So you don’t want to suffer?  Me neither.  The path for that is one of right view and thinking, right speech, action, and livelihood, and right diligence/effort, mindfulness, and concentration.  Basically, do good not only for your own sake, but for others as well, ’cause we’re all in this together.  Doing good will make you feel good and helping others will make you feel your own problems less.  It works.  I’ve tried it.

Now, there’s one last conundrum, and it’s a doozey.  How do you stop suffering if wanting leads to suffering but you want to stop suffering and if you didn’t want to stop suffering you wouldn’t be trying to stop wanting?  Well, the Buddhists have a saying: You only need a boat to cross an ocean.  After you get to the other side, you leave the boat behind.  So that one kind of desire, the desire to end suffering, can be useful.  Chuck everything else and in the end, you’ll chuck that one, too.  That’s when you know you’ve made it.

No matter which trail you pick, Theravada, Mahayana, Vajrayana, or Cowgirl, may it be a happy one!

6 Comments leave one →
  1. Ben permalink
    March 29, 2011 12:59 am

    Thanks for your post. After growing up Presbyterian for 38 years I happened upon a podcast my wife downloaded called Dharma classes. There was this old lady fumbling about talking about recognizing our own neuroses…I couldn’t believe how she was describing precisely how I act and how I feel. Later looked her up and it was Pema Chodron. I feel like I am having a metaphysical mid-life crisis. The concepts so deep inside of me are being challenged. Good vs evil, right vs wrong as opposed to awareness/shenpa. But the later seem to work much better and seem more applicable to my life – less abstract.
    Is there some kind of 12 step program to deprogram your mind…I can listen and understand but then it gets lost in translation to heart and actions. I am trying hard to come back to the openness and recognize my triggers/acknowledge them/and see myself in a different way. But my mind is so programmed to quickly return to the habituations when things are difficult. As a man I assume I can just fix myself after one good action or even the idea of fixing myself I guess is off-base. My family think I have lost my marbles, my wife probably thinks I’m bipolar, and I am obsessing more about my own ego than how to just be respectful when I feel uncomfortable/uncertain/in a strange place. But in some ways I am happier than I have been for years because I feel like I can really get into this…I just can’t seem to do it very well.
    Anyhow, sorry to ramble on. I enjoyed your post on Shenpa and will continue to read your ideas here. I know there is no magic formula for me except to stay as long as I can and then come back when I don’t…my problem seems to be feeling like I’m abandoning my parents/church/christianity…where are all of the 21st century Thomas Merton’s?

    • March 29, 2011 8:16 am


      Welcome to the path. Pema Chodron is a good place to start. She has such a knack for making things recognizable to us everyday American schmoes. :-)

      I know it can be bewildering to suddenly find all this new (actually very old) wisdom out there that seems to point at ‘us’ as the source of all our problems. But remember, we are also the solution. We all have the ability to act as wise, compassionate beings. Learning how to do that is a lifelong process. It’s not something that will happen overnight, but little by little. Start by being kind to yourself. Yes, you have neuroses. So do I. So does everyone. Just know that there are a lot of people (probably in your own family and community, such as your wife and church) ready to support you.

      I don’t know that there is anything as ‘simple’ as a twelve step program. Meditation instruction is a good place to start. Almost any sangha (Buddhist community) will teach it and there are many sources of secular meditation instruction these days. It really depends on where you live. Some churches (especially the Unitarian Universalists) even offer courses in Zen meditation or vipassana. If you’re interested in learning more about meditation, I recommend Turning the Mind Into an Ally by Sakyong Mipham. This is a good introduction to samatha, or calm abiding mediation. If you’re interested in Buddhism, I recommend The Heart of Buddha’s Teaching by Thich Nhat Hanh. The website has a good world Buddhist directory that includes a lot of meditation groups and centers. Buddhism is radically diverse, so it may take some shopping around.

      There are also some good podcasts to help you right now, as you’ve already discovered. Buddhist Geeks is a favorite of mine. On Being with Krista Tippet on NPR. Interfaith Voices just had a show (1/20/11) with Karen Armstrong about her ‘Twelve-Step’ program to cultivate empathy and compassion. You might check that out.

      Feeling like you are abandoning the church in which you’ve spent the last 38 years must be very difficult. I left the United Methodist Church when I was 15-years-old, much to my family’s disappointment. I discovered Buddhism when I was 22. Since then I’ve actually gained a much better understanding and respect for Christianity than I ever had before. I think if I had found Buddhism when I was still Christian, I would still be Christian. Although much of the language is very different (and there are some points of genuine disagreement), the two religions have many things in common. Both try to address human suffering, for example. I recommend another book, Going Home: Jesus and Buddha as Brothers also by Thich Nhat Hanh.

      Otherwise, just keep paying attention. Be mindful. Have loving-kindness, especially for yourself. You might even try loving-kindness (metta) meditation. And know that you are not alone on the path. You’re here with all the rest of us. Welcome!


  2. Luke permalink
    May 23, 2011 12:30 am

    Hi Monica, great article. Just wanted to note a (really minor, not exactly crucial) confusion. I’m just being OCD right now…

    The third turning of the wheel isn’t Vajrayana. The “turnings of the wheel” model is general Mahayana, common to all schools. The third turning of the wheel is the Buddha’s teachings on Buddha-nature, Tathagatagarbha, etc. Vajrayana considers itself to be a special form of Mahayana, not something beyond Mahayana. The writings generally considered to fall under the third turning include writers like Asanga, and many sutras common to both Tibetan and East Asian traditions.

    Anyways, I like the sound of Cowgirl dharma. Sounds good.

    • May 23, 2011 6:40 am


      Thanks for the clarification. That’s not how I’d heard it described, but it makes sense. I’ll look into it. Maybe there will be a future post on tathagatagarbha on it! Thanks, again!



  1. 2011 Roundup « Dharma Cowgirl
  2. Refocusing « Dharma Cowgirl

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: